Dear Correspondents of the local press,
the show and its reading vs. Articles in their Christmas here shows the total absence of the undersigned in the political debate within the local municipal council, at least, I repeat, according to newspaper reading.
Just look at the various reports related to the seat of the Municipal Council of 27 December 2009.
Most of the newspapers even mentioned the presence of the undersigned, Carlino only shows what happened on the position I have taken in the Council, but only one of two articles in this Dec. 29, it gives me another '"absent" as if I was going to make me a sandwich, while, as you know, my way out of the classroom was an expression of a specific political position that I regularly motivated and that is recorded.
For the Messenger instead just do not exist, as well as according to Corriere Adriatico, where there is not even listed among those who have not voted.
It has given an account of the choice of Mrs Valeria Ruit not to participate in the vote, but omitting to mention myself, who first took this position! Ben
are aware citizens who follow the Council on TV is no accident that in many, in expressing appreciation, have made specific reference to what happened to understand word for word the meaning of the choice I made and declared and the sequence of the debate, which has seen some colleagues - each for its own reasons - to be appended to the conduct I had adopted, even mention in the statement.
shame that you have recorded anything of it.
Dear Correspondents, which is the case in question actually represented in your articles.
Maybe you're too focused on the 'priority list' that some prominent politician - always this hyper on the pages of local newspapers complete with a giant - is at pains to convey, through highly efficient office printing personal or party?
Or consider that the policy out of PD and PDL is not worth being told?
And when did you decide?
The last case, which frankly I am appalled and moved to write this note, relates al'articolo Carlino appeared on the 10 / 1, relating the story of the foundry Fioretti.
The author, journalist Fabio Caporalini, perhaps unaware that the topic Fioretti lies about a month in a query signature of the undersigned that the Council will be presenting Thursday, 14/01?
The reporter knows that the question asks account of relevant circumstances l'attuale rinvio a giudizio della azienda in questione?
Non sarebbe stato interessante per i lettori averne notizia nell'ambito dell'articolo citato, che per il resto è piuttosto documentato e dettagliato?
Non sarebbe interessato ai giornalisti raccogliere qualche opinione politica sull'argomento, visto che sulla Fioretti sembra esserci una convergenza 'bipartisan' sul... silenzio?
Vi interessa informare o vi basta fare da megafono a chi ha più potere?
O forse è colpa della sottoscritta, che non passa le "veline", se le sue iniziative non hanno la roboante eco della più insignificante delle interrogazioni presentata e 'pompata' però del 'personaggio giusto'?
Non credo sia questa la ragione lack of interest regarding my political action, as on my press releases may also be that you apply a 'filter' (see press release on the landfill landslide, news totally ignored by two newspapers on three!). On
newspapers with TV and radio stations can not say much, I have no time to follow the news and so I abstain from any underlining.
I would just like to highlight to the Prime Minister, which I read for information, which shows that what I represented when there are no conditions for waiving the registration and TV broadcast of the City Council, a choice that is periodically challenged by charging the presence an overemphasis of the camera by advisers.
view of the case, please count me among those who believe the essential choice to broadcast TV recording full of tips, mindful of what he taught us the President Pertini, who argued that the worst democracy is better than the best dictatorship.
Dear friends, democracy is the responsibility of us all, not only of politicians but of all citizens and a lot of journalists, who have to be servants of Truth and remember the moral of being loyal to their readers.
The dignity of this beautiful craft resides only in accordance with these principles.
I regret that it was forced to this note: it is always annoying talk about themselves, or at least it is for me, it is no coincidence that I have refrained until now, despite the custom of the local press is the same as ever and has characterized this consiliatura since its inception.
The hope is that those who are interested in a freedom of information, proper and effective implementation are encouraged, thanks to this complaint and to conduct more 'brave' and authentically democratic.
Finally I would like to point out what seems a truism, but maybe not.
The voters complain that politicians are always the same in the limelight and hold places of power, the press on the one hand is often to collect these moods, on the other usually conforms to the law of the strongest in terms of communication before the electoral weight, only to amplify the meaning of the political parties of those who count on stronger electoral propaganda and marketing capabilities.
But democracy is not good for the opposite?
That is, a free press and attentive to the 'equal opportunities'?...
Sincerely Anna
Cimarelli - City Council Ordinary People group
0 comments:
Post a Comment