Qui la notizia: http://www.salonelibro.it/it/salone/paese-ospite.html
Monday, January 25, 2010
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Microsoft Publisher Wedding Booklet
Alla stampa locale
Dear Correspondents of the local press,
the show and its reading vs. Articles in their Christmas here shows the total absence of the undersigned in the political debate within the local municipal council, at least, I repeat, according to newspaper reading.
Just look at the various reports related to the seat of the Municipal Council of 27 December 2009.
Most of the newspapers even mentioned the presence of the undersigned, Carlino only shows what happened on the position I have taken in the Council, but only one of two articles in this Dec. 29, it gives me another '"absent" as if I was going to make me a sandwich, while, as you know, my way out of the classroom was an expression of a specific political position that I regularly motivated and that is recorded.
For the Messenger instead just do not exist, as well as according to Corriere Adriatico, where there is not even listed among those who have not voted.
It has given an account of the choice of Mrs Valeria Ruit not to participate in the vote, but omitting to mention myself, who first took this position! Ben
are aware citizens who follow the Council on TV is no accident that in many, in expressing appreciation, have made specific reference to what happened to understand word for word the meaning of the choice I made and declared and the sequence of the debate, which has seen some colleagues - each for its own reasons - to be appended to the conduct I had adopted, even mention in the statement.
shame that you have recorded anything of it.
Dear Correspondents, which is the case in question actually represented in your articles.
Maybe you're too focused on the 'priority list' that some prominent politician - always this hyper on the pages of local newspapers complete with a giant - is at pains to convey, through highly efficient office printing personal or party?
Or consider that the policy out of PD and PDL is not worth being told?
And when did you decide?
The last case, which frankly I am appalled and moved to write this note, relates al'articolo Carlino appeared on the 10 / 1, relating the story of the foundry Fioretti.
The author, journalist Fabio Caporalini, perhaps unaware that the topic Fioretti lies about a month in a query signature of the undersigned that the Council will be presenting Thursday, 14/01?
The reporter knows that the question asks account of relevant circumstances l'attuale rinvio a giudizio della azienda in questione?
Non sarebbe stato interessante per i lettori averne notizia nell'ambito dell'articolo citato, che per il resto è piuttosto documentato e dettagliato?
Non sarebbe interessato ai giornalisti raccogliere qualche opinione politica sull'argomento, visto che sulla Fioretti sembra esserci una convergenza 'bipartisan' sul... silenzio?
Vi interessa informare o vi basta fare da megafono a chi ha più potere?
O forse è colpa della sottoscritta, che non passa le "veline", se le sue iniziative non hanno la roboante eco della più insignificante delle interrogazioni presentata e 'pompata' però del 'personaggio giusto'?
Non credo sia questa la ragione lack of interest regarding my political action, as on my press releases may also be that you apply a 'filter' (see press release on the landfill landslide, news totally ignored by two newspapers on three!). On
newspapers with TV and radio stations can not say much, I have no time to follow the news and so I abstain from any underlining.
I would just like to highlight to the Prime Minister, which I read for information, which shows that what I represented when there are no conditions for waiving the registration and TV broadcast of the City Council, a choice that is periodically challenged by charging the presence an overemphasis of the camera by advisers.
view of the case, please count me among those who believe the essential choice to broadcast TV recording full of tips, mindful of what he taught us the President Pertini, who argued that the worst democracy is better than the best dictatorship.
Dear friends, democracy is the responsibility of us all, not only of politicians but of all citizens and a lot of journalists, who have to be servants of Truth and remember the moral of being loyal to their readers.
The dignity of this beautiful craft resides only in accordance with these principles.
I regret that it was forced to this note: it is always annoying talk about themselves, or at least it is for me, it is no coincidence that I have refrained until now, despite the custom of the local press is the same as ever and has characterized this consiliatura since its inception.
The hope is that those who are interested in a freedom of information, proper and effective implementation are encouraged, thanks to this complaint and to conduct more 'brave' and authentically democratic.
Finally I would like to point out what seems a truism, but maybe not.
The voters complain that politicians are always the same in the limelight and hold places of power, the press on the one hand is often to collect these moods, on the other usually conforms to the law of the strongest in terms of communication before the electoral weight, only to amplify the meaning of the political parties of those who count on stronger electoral propaganda and marketing capabilities.
But democracy is not good for the opposite?
That is, a free press and attentive to the 'equal opportunities'?...
Sincerely Anna
Cimarelli - City Council Ordinary People group
Dear Correspondents of the local press,
the show and its reading vs. Articles in their Christmas here shows the total absence of the undersigned in the political debate within the local municipal council, at least, I repeat, according to newspaper reading.
Just look at the various reports related to the seat of the Municipal Council of 27 December 2009.
Most of the newspapers even mentioned the presence of the undersigned, Carlino only shows what happened on the position I have taken in the Council, but only one of two articles in this Dec. 29, it gives me another '"absent" as if I was going to make me a sandwich, while, as you know, my way out of the classroom was an expression of a specific political position that I regularly motivated and that is recorded.
For the Messenger instead just do not exist, as well as according to Corriere Adriatico, where there is not even listed among those who have not voted.
It has given an account of the choice of Mrs Valeria Ruit not to participate in the vote, but omitting to mention myself, who first took this position! Ben
are aware citizens who follow the Council on TV is no accident that in many, in expressing appreciation, have made specific reference to what happened to understand word for word the meaning of the choice I made and declared and the sequence of the debate, which has seen some colleagues - each for its own reasons - to be appended to the conduct I had adopted, even mention in the statement.
shame that you have recorded anything of it.
Dear Correspondents, which is the case in question actually represented in your articles.
Maybe you're too focused on the 'priority list' that some prominent politician - always this hyper on the pages of local newspapers complete with a giant - is at pains to convey, through highly efficient office printing personal or party?
Or consider that the policy out of PD and PDL is not worth being told?
And when did you decide?
The last case, which frankly I am appalled and moved to write this note, relates al'articolo Carlino appeared on the 10 / 1, relating the story of the foundry Fioretti.
The author, journalist Fabio Caporalini, perhaps unaware that the topic Fioretti lies about a month in a query signature of the undersigned that the Council will be presenting Thursday, 14/01?
The reporter knows that the question asks account of relevant circumstances l'attuale rinvio a giudizio della azienda in questione?
Non sarebbe stato interessante per i lettori averne notizia nell'ambito dell'articolo citato, che per il resto è piuttosto documentato e dettagliato?
Non sarebbe interessato ai giornalisti raccogliere qualche opinione politica sull'argomento, visto che sulla Fioretti sembra esserci una convergenza 'bipartisan' sul... silenzio?
Vi interessa informare o vi basta fare da megafono a chi ha più potere?
O forse è colpa della sottoscritta, che non passa le "veline", se le sue iniziative non hanno la roboante eco della più insignificante delle interrogazioni presentata e 'pompata' però del 'personaggio giusto'?
Non credo sia questa la ragione lack of interest regarding my political action, as on my press releases may also be that you apply a 'filter' (see press release on the landfill landslide, news totally ignored by two newspapers on three!). On
newspapers with TV and radio stations can not say much, I have no time to follow the news and so I abstain from any underlining.
I would just like to highlight to the Prime Minister, which I read for information, which shows that what I represented when there are no conditions for waiving the registration and TV broadcast of the City Council, a choice that is periodically challenged by charging the presence an overemphasis of the camera by advisers.
view of the case, please count me among those who believe the essential choice to broadcast TV recording full of tips, mindful of what he taught us the President Pertini, who argued that the worst democracy is better than the best dictatorship.
Dear friends, democracy is the responsibility of us all, not only of politicians but of all citizens and a lot of journalists, who have to be servants of Truth and remember the moral of being loyal to their readers.
The dignity of this beautiful craft resides only in accordance with these principles.
I regret that it was forced to this note: it is always annoying talk about themselves, or at least it is for me, it is no coincidence that I have refrained until now, despite the custom of the local press is the same as ever and has characterized this consiliatura since its inception.
The hope is that those who are interested in a freedom of information, proper and effective implementation are encouraged, thanks to this complaint and to conduct more 'brave' and authentically democratic.
Finally I would like to point out what seems a truism, but maybe not.
The voters complain that politicians are always the same in the limelight and hold places of power, the press on the one hand is often to collect these moods, on the other usually conforms to the law of the strongest in terms of communication before the electoral weight, only to amplify the meaning of the political parties of those who count on stronger electoral propaganda and marketing capabilities.
But democracy is not good for the opposite?
That is, a free press and attentive to the 'equal opportunities'?...
Sincerely Anna
Cimarelli - City Council Ordinary People group
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Rhus Tree South Africa
Interrogazione Consiliare sulla Scuola M.L.King
Tolentino, 15 December 2009 Council Chamber Group
ORDINARY PEOPLE
Chairman of the Board
the Mayor
the City of Toledo
Subject: Questions for Oral Answer
- In view of the work concerning the building of the school complex ML King;
Given the concerns mentioned during the session of the City Council on November 26 in U.S. refer to works performed poorly, and in fact the answers were provided by the Administration;
He demands to know :
1. Were there any records or documents of the municipal offices in charge of irregularities which have formally recognized or not disputed work performed in a workmanlike manner and in such cases to know the contents;
2. The real state of play regarding the quality of works, the same compliance with current safety standards.
Councillor Anna
Cimarelli
Tolentino, 15 December 2009 Council Chamber Group
ORDINARY PEOPLE
Chairman of the Board
the Mayor
the City of Toledo
Subject: Questions for Oral Answer
- In view of the work concerning the building of the school complex ML King;
Given the concerns mentioned during the session of the City Council on November 26 in U.S. refer to works performed poorly, and in fact the answers were provided by the Administration;
He demands to know :
1. Were there any records or documents of the municipal offices in charge of irregularities which have formally recognized or not disputed work performed in a workmanlike manner and in such cases to know the contents;
2. The real state of play regarding the quality of works, the same compliance with current safety standards.
Councillor Anna
Cimarelli
Cold Sore High Inside Nose Nose
Interrogazione Consiliare sulla Ditta Fioretti
Tolentino, 13 December 2010 Council Chamber Group
ORDINARY PEOPLE
Chairman of the Board
the Mayor of Toledo
Subject: Questions for Oral Answer
- Given the resolution City Council of 20 December 2007 by which the City Council undertook to "take all appropriate steps as required to initiate and complete the relocation process," to draw up a protocol agreement with the company 'in the introduction to the relocation and to determine, in mutual agreement, the timing and chronology of work, taking account of the provisional authorization expires on 31 December 2010 "and" periodically request and in any event at intervals not exceeding six months, controls on air pollution, noise pollution and the spread of bad smells so 'as reflected by just dell'ARPAM "
- Due to the formal notice of the Province of Macerata in the June 5, 2008 with which he drew The company Metallurgical Fioretti "to ensure the restoration of conditions of law, eliminating the presence of unauthorized substances," having found that "emissions from the plant Tolentino Metallurgica Fioretti spa does not comply with the requirements in 'act of authorization, as molecules containing non-authorized, namely carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and Volatile Organic Compounds (SOV) "and that" the company does not carry out checks twice a year, but rather once a 'year or even every year;
- Given the results of monitoring of atmospheric deposition on a hat and at the gardens John Lennon's public 24/09/2009, documenting high concentrations of dust of iron and aluminum in the areas examined, with particular regard Via Cappellacci;
Given the responses that he gave to the Mayor presented by the City Council signed on 20 December 2007;
It demands to know:
1. If the City has requested and obtained six months in the past two years, the data on air pollution, noise pollution and the spread of bad smells as prescribed by resolution of the City Council cited in the introduction;
2. If you are remedied by the Company irregularities of the plants that emit dust, fumes and noise;
3. If you have initiated the procedure for relocation and prepared the documents for the necessary modification to the PRG (as stated by the Mayor) and the subsequent allocation of the new location;
4. What measures will take the Town Council, and which - if necessary - were taken in relation to the deadline for the regional authorization, 31 December 2010.
Councillor Anna
Cimarelli
Tolentino, 13 December 2010 Council Chamber Group
ORDINARY PEOPLE
Chairman of the Board
the Mayor of Toledo
Subject: Questions for Oral Answer
- Given the resolution City Council of 20 December 2007 by which the City Council undertook to "take all appropriate steps as required to initiate and complete the relocation process," to draw up a protocol agreement with the company 'in the introduction to the relocation and to determine, in mutual agreement, the timing and chronology of work, taking account of the provisional authorization expires on 31 December 2010 "and" periodically request and in any event at intervals not exceeding six months, controls on air pollution, noise pollution and the spread of bad smells so 'as reflected by just dell'ARPAM "
- Due to the formal notice of the Province of Macerata in the June 5, 2008 with which he drew The company Metallurgical Fioretti "to ensure the restoration of conditions of law, eliminating the presence of unauthorized substances," having found that "emissions from the plant Tolentino Metallurgica Fioretti spa does not comply with the requirements in 'act of authorization, as molecules containing non-authorized, namely carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and Volatile Organic Compounds (SOV) "and that" the company does not carry out checks twice a year, but rather once a 'year or even every year;
- Given the results of monitoring of atmospheric deposition on a hat and at the gardens John Lennon's public 24/09/2009, documenting high concentrations of dust of iron and aluminum in the areas examined, with particular regard Via Cappellacci;
Given the responses that he gave to the Mayor presented by the City Council signed on 20 December 2007;
It demands to know:
1. If the City has requested and obtained six months in the past two years, the data on air pollution, noise pollution and the spread of bad smells as prescribed by resolution of the City Council cited in the introduction;
2. If you are remedied by the Company irregularities of the plants that emit dust, fumes and noise;
3. If you have initiated the procedure for relocation and prepared the documents for the necessary modification to the PRG (as stated by the Mayor) and the subsequent allocation of the new location;
4. What measures will take the Town Council, and which - if necessary - were taken in relation to the deadline for the regional authorization, 31 December 2010.
Councillor Anna
Cimarelli
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)